Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 73:23
אלא אי אמרת אינו מועד קתני פסקה מאי תו את שמועד לו משלם נזק שלם ואת שאינו מועד לו משלם ח"נ עד השתא לא אשמעינן דהתם משלם ח"נ ומועד משלם נזק שלם
is the correct text, this statement is complete in itself, and why then the further statement 'IN RESPECT OF DAMAGE DONE TO THE SPECIES TO WHICH IT WAS <i>MU'AD</i>, THE PAYMENT WILL HAVE TO BE IN FULL, BUT IN RESPECT OF DAMAGE DONE TO THAT TO WHICH IT WAS NOT <i>MU'AD</i>, THE COMPENSATION WILL BE FOR HALF THE DAMAGE ONLY? Have we not been told before how that in the case of <i>mu'ad</i> the payment is for half the damage whereas in the case of <i>Mu'ad</i> the payment has to be in full?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 73. ');"><sup>18</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 73:23. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.