Quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 15:1

ולמאי דסליק אדעתין מעיקרא בין שעירבו ובין שלא עירבו פליגי בעירבו במאי פליגי בשלא עירבו במאי פליגי

According to our previous assumption, however, that [Rab and Samuel] are in disagreement irrespective of whether a joint 'erub was made<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Between the residents of the alley and those of the courtyard.');">¹</span> or not,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. that (a) Rab forbids the movement of objects in the alley, even if a joint 'erub was made, on the ground of the exposure of the alley through the breach to a public domain; that (b) only the breach causes the prohibition but not the right of passage of the courtyard residents through the alley; that (c) Rab Judah's ruling (supra 7a ad fin.) represents the view of Samuel who, if a joint 'erub was made, permits the use of the alley despite the breach (as is evident from his decision in the case of a backyard which has no residents and which in respect of the laws under discussion has the same status as a courtyard that has residents who joined those of the alley in their 'erub) and that (d) where no joint 'erub was made between the residents of the courtyard and the alley Samuel forbids the use of the latter even where there was no breach (as follows from the fact that in his permission he mentioned a backyard, which has no residents, and not a courtyard which has residents) .');">²</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 15:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.