Quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 39:16

דתנן רבי יהודה אומר אם היתה דרך רה"ר מפסקתן יסלקנה לצדדין וחכ"א אינו צריך רבי יוחנן ור"א דאמרי תרווייהו כאן הודיעך כחן של מחיצות

not this] obvious, for if [the strips had] not [Pentateuchally constituted a valid] partition how could it have been permitted to draw water?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'to fill' (Sc. the cattle troughs or buckets) from the well which is a private domain. By so doing one would be guilty of carrying from a private domain into a public domain since an enclosed area that is not a private domain even Pentateuchally must assume the status of the public domain in which it is situated. MS.M. reads: 'how could the Rabbis permit the movement (of objects) '.');">³⁴</span> - [The ruling]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of R. Eleazar.');">³⁵</span> was necessary only [for this purpose:] That [a man] who put up, in a public domain, [an enclosure]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which there was no well.');">³⁶</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 39:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.