Quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 24:8

ועל דמבטיל גיטא ועל דמסר מודעא אגיטא ועל דמצער שלוחא דרבנן ועל דחלה שמתא עילויה תלתין יומין

or harassed a messenger of the Rabbis,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sent to summon him to court.');">¹⁸</span> or per - mitted a ban to remain upon him thirty days,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Without seeking its remission by expressing his regret at the offence which had occasioned it and undertaking to amend his ways. Buchler in MGWJ 1934 (Festschrift) p. 129, observes that as far as known the ban, during the days of Jamnia and Usha (first century) was imposed only on scholars, but that in the early amoraic period all were subject to it, as here (v. note 3, a.l.) .');">¹⁹</span> and a son-in-law who dwelt in his mother-in-law's house thirty days.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Contrary to modern belief, the love between these two was regarded as so strong as to endanger their morals; cf. Pes. 113a.');">²⁰</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 24:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.