Quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 31:7

מסתברא שטר ה"ל לרבויי שכן מוציאה בבת ישראל אדרבה חזקה ה"ל לרבויי שכן קונה בנכסי הגר באישות מיהת לא אשכחן אי בעית אימא להכי אהני אם אחרת

Then say: Only they [are acquired] by deed, but not another? - But it is written, she shall not go out as menservants do.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From which it was deduced that she can be acquired by deed.');">¹⁰</span> And why do you prefer it so?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'what (reason) do you see' (for interpreting it thus) ? Perhaps Lev. XXV, 46 teaches, only they are acquired by deed, but not another, while Ex. XXI, 7 intimates, she shall not go out . . but may he acquired as menservants, viz., by hazakah?');">¹¹</span> - It is logical that 'deed' is included [as a means of acquisition], since it divorces an Israelite daughter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence, just as it is effective in one instance, so also in another, viz., the acquisition of a slave. - Tosaf.: he could also have said: Because it brings a Jewish daughter into the married state, which is more appropriate, both then referring to acquisition, but a 'deed' is explicitly stated in connection with divorce. A proselyte who dies without Jewish issue has no legal heirs and his property after death falls to the first occupier by means of hazakah.');">¹²</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 31:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.