Quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 69:2
ולרבי יוחנן בן ברוקא נמי ניהוו פריה ורביה ומורא שני כתובים הבאים כאחד ואין מלמדין צריכי דאי כתב רחמנא מורא ולא כתב פריה ורביה הוה אמינא וכבשוה אמר רחמנא איש דדרכו לכבש אין אשה דאין דרכה לכבש לא
which do not illumine [other cases]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that on the contrary only these are obligatory, but not others.');"><sup>3</sup></span> - Both are necessary. For if the Divine Law wrote fear and not procreation, I would argue, The Divine Law stated, [Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,] and conquer it: only a man, whose nature It is to conquer, but not a woman, as it is not her nature to conquer.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And as this is stated together with procreation, the same ruling governs both.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Kiddushin 69:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.