Quoting%20commentary for Nedarim 133:3
ואין צריך לומר שקיים אחד מהן למה לי למיתנא השתא יש לומר הפר זה בלא זה ולא כלום קיים אחד מהן למה לי צריכא למיתני
AND IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING IF ONE OF THEM CONFIRMED [IT]. Then why teach it? If we say that annulment by one without the other is invalid, what need is there to state 'IF ONE OF THEM CONFIRMED [IT]?' — It is necessary, in the case where one of them annulled it and the other confirmed it, and then the latter sought absolution of his confirmation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By a Rabbi, who granted it to him just as he would for a vows. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> I might think, that which he confirmed, he has surely overthrown;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Either that the very revoking of his confirmation is in itself the equivalent of nullification, or, having revoked his confirmation, he is now free to nullify the vow. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Nedarim 133:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.