Quoting%20commentary for Sanhedrin 66:11
ואין מחזירין לחובה: אמר ר' חייא בר אבא אמר רבי יוחנן והוא שטעה בדבר שאין הצדוקין מודין בו אבל טעה בדבר שהצדוקין מודין בו זיל קרי בי רב הוא
it has been taught likewise: Whence [do we infer the same procedure] for those liable to exile? — Identify of law is derived from the use of 'murderer' in both places. And in the case of those liable to flogging? — From the fact that 'guilty' is used in both places.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tosef. Sanh. VII. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> BUT NOT FOR CONDEMNATION. R. Hiyya b. Abba said in R. Johanan's name: Proving that he erred in a matter which the Sadducees<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H]. A party holding views directly opposite to those of the Pharisees. They regarded only those observances obligatory which are contained in the written Word, and did not recognise those derived from Rabbinical interpretations; but v. p. 239, n. 9. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Sanhedrin 66:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.