Quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 112:13
כנגד היסוד מנא לן א"ר אליעזר אתיא זריקה זריקה מעולה
THEY ARE SLAUGHTERED IN ANY PART OF THE TEMPLE COURT, AND THEIR BLOOD REQUIRES ONE SPRINKLING, PROVIDED THAT IT IS APPLIED OVER AGAINST THE BASE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On a part of the altar which has a base under it. This excludes the east and south (v. supra 53b) .');"><sup>13</sup></span> THEY DIFFERED IN THEIR CONSUMPTION [AS FOLLOWS]: THE FIRSTLING WAS EATEN BY PRIESTS [ONLY], WHILE THE TITHE MIGHT BE EATEN BY ANY MAN. AND THEY WERE EATEN IN ANY PART OF THE CITY, PREPARED IN ANY MANNER, DURING TWO DAYS AND ONE NIGHT. THE PASSOVER-OFFERING MIGHT BE EATEN ONLY AT NIGHT, ONLY UNTIL MIDNIGHT, AND IT MIGHT BE EATEN ONLY BY THOSE REGISTERED FOR IT,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By people who had previously registered themselves for that particular animal.');"><sup>14</sup></span> AND IT MIGHT BE EATEN ONLY ROASTED. <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Which Tanna [rules thus]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Mishnah enumerates the differences in their mode of consumption only. Whence it follows that they are alike in respect of sprinkling and presentation of emurim. Whose view is this?');"><sup>15</sup></span> - Said R'Hisda, It is R'Jose the Galilean. For it was taught, R'Jos the Galilean said: Not 'its blood' is said, but 'their blood'; not 'its fat' is said, but 'their fat': this teac concerning the firstling, tithe, and the Passover-offering, that their blood and emurim must be presented at the altar.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra ');"><sup>16</sup></span> How do we know [that it must be sprinkled] over against the base? - Said R'Eleazar: The meaning of 'sprinkling'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Written in connection with the firstling and tithe.');"><sup>17</sup></span> is learned from a burnt-offering.
Explore quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 112:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.