Reference for Bava Batra 296:16
(ל"א הקדיש כל נכסיו מהו הפקיר כל נכסיו מהו חילק כל נכסיו לעניים מהו תיקו)
Is it assumed that since [ownerless property may be seized] by the poor<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that it is possible for the property to fall into the hands of some poor man. ');"><sup>43</sup></span> as well as by the rich, he transfers [therefore] unqualified possession<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Without any reservation in case of recovery. ');"><sup>41</sup></span> or, perhaps, whenever it is a matter of personal interests one does not transfer unqualified possession? [If the answer is in the negative,]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because the property may happen to fall into the hands of a rich man. ');"><sup>44</sup></span>