Reference for Bava Batra 307:5
והא איפליגו בה חדא זימנא דתניא אין נאמנין לפוסלו דברי רבי מאיר וחכמים אומרים נאמנין
are of the opinion [that], where one admitted that he wrote a deed, [independent] attestation [also] is required.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it is incumbent upon the donee to procure the necessary attestation. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> But [did] they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Meir and the Sages. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> [not], however, once dispute on this [question]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whether a deed acknowledged by its writer as genuine, also requires attestation before a court. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> For it was taught [in a Baraitha]: They<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Witnesses who identified their signatures on a deed. ');"><sup>20</sup></span>
Explore reference for Bava Batra 307:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.