Reference for Bava Batra 345:16

ונחזי תברא בשמא דמאן דכתיב אמר רב הושעיא במשולשין בשטר ואין משולשין בשובר

[IF] A MAN FOUND AMONG HIS DEEDS [A RECORD TO THE EFFECT THAT] THE BOND OF JOSEPH SON OF SIMEON [WAS] DISCHARGED, THE BONDS OF BOTH [ARE CONSIDERED TO BE] DISCHARGED etc. The reason<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why the bonds of both are considered as discharged and no claim may be advanced against either of them. ');">⁴⁶</span> is thus because [a record] was found, but had there been found none, [a bond] could be presented [against one of them]? Surely we have learnt, NOR MAY ANOTHER [PERSON] PRODUCE A BOND OF INDEBTEDNESS AGAINST THEM! — R. Jeremiah replied: In [the case where the bonds record the names of] the third [generation].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. our Mishnah. In such a case bonds may be presented against them. ');">⁴⁷</span> Then let us see in whose name the discharge was made out!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'written'. Why, then, should the bonds of both be considered discharged. ');">⁴⁸</span>

Jastrow