Reference for Bava Kamma 136:18

דאמר רבא צא תן לו טבח ומכר פטור מ"ט

Now the reason is that he consecrated it: he has not to make four-fold and five-fold payments because when he slaughtered the animal it was a consecrated animal that he slaughtered; had he not, however, consecrated it he would have had to make four-fold and five-fold payments if he would have slaughtered it. Now, if you assume that Renunciation transfers ownership why should he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 390, n. 2. ');">¹⁶</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow