Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Kamma 229:10

רב זביד אמר כגון שנתייאשו הבעלים ביד לוקח ולא נתייאשו ביד גנב

for you might have thought that priestly portions are not subject to the law of robbery;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For since they are endowments by Divine Law they always remain priestly property wherever they are, so that even where the vendor has personally delivered them to the purchaser it should be the latter alone who would be responsible to the priest. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> we are therefore told [here that this is not so]. But according to Abaye who stated that there was a difference of opinion between them,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab and R. Johanan. ');"><sup>18</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse