Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Kamma 229:18

משכנתא שוי מאתן במאה עשו בו תקנת השוק שוה בשוה אמימר אמר לא עשו בו תקנת השוק מר זוטרא אמר עשו בו תקנת השוק

may sue the second, i.e., the claim of the purchaser for repayment should be against the proprietors since the benefit of market overt does apply also here.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the theft has definitely been established. ');"><sup>31</sup></span> But does Rab really maintain that the benefit of market overt should not apply here?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the theft has definitely been established. ');"><sup>31</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse