Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Kamma 229:9

ולאביי דאמר פליגי במאי פליגי בדרב חסדא

weighed it for him, the priest would have to sue the butcher!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Now, we are dealing here with a case where there was no Renunciation (v. p. 681, n. 12); why then does Rab maintain that the priest would have to sue the butcher and not the Purchaser? ');"><sup>15</sup></span> — Read: 'He can sue also the butcher,'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Having the option to sue either the butcher (who is the vendor) or the purchaser, for the reason stated supra p. 681, n. 10. ');"><sup>16</sup></span>

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only

Jastrow

Available for Premium members only
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse