Reference for Bava Kamma 47:13
נמצאת כת ראשונה זוממת הרי כאן שתי עדיות והוא פטור והן פטורים נמצאת כת שניה זוממת הרי כאן עדות אחת והוא פטור והן פטורים
since R. Jose agrees with him [on this point].' Raba, however, said to R. Nahman: 'Why, Sir, not say that the <i>Halachah</i> is in accordance with R. Meir regarding <i>Mu'ad</i> for R. Simeon agrees with him, and the <i>Halachah</i> is in accordance with R. Judah regarding <i>Tam</i>, since R. Simeon agrees with him [on this point]?' He answered him: 'I side with R. Jose, because the reasons of R. Jose are generally sound.'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'his depth is with him.' v. Git. 67a. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> There arose the following question: Do the three days [under discussion] apply to [the goring of] the cattle [so that cases of goring on the same day do not count as more than one], or to the owner [who has to be warned on three different days]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Regarding three acts of goring committed by his cattle even on one day. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>