Reference for Bava Kamma 81:11
ומועד לעובדי כוכבים הוי מועד לישראל אלא אמר רשב"ל כגון שהרג שלשה בני אדם טרפה
<b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. But since when it was still the state of <i>Tam</i> it had to be killed [for manslaughter], how could it ever have been possible to declare it <i>Mu'ad</i>? — Rabbah said: We are dealing here with a case where, e.g. it had been estimated that it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The ox. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma
HALAKHAH: “A bull which is notorious for its kind,” etc. After it killed one human, is it not notorious29Any animal which killed “a man or a woman” has to be killed (Ex. 21:28). How can such an animal ever become notorious after three times if it is killed after the first time?? Rav said, if it killed three Gentiles30Who are not subsumed under the appellation “man or woman”. Babli 41a, in the name of Rav Sheshet.. Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, if it pursued three times and it was estimated that every pursuit was for goring31For endangering humans, an animal may become notorious for trying three times..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy