Reference for Bava Kamma 86:11

דלמא תנא ושייר

[But how could Raba prove his point from this case here?]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By not extending the ruling in the second clause to refer also to the barn but confining it to the goat which should have run away, and to the slave, on the alleged ground that no compensation should be paid for the value of the loss occasioned by fire burning a human being to death. ');">¹⁰</span>

Jastrow