Reference for Bava Metzia 11:2
ותו הא דתני רבי חייא שניהם נשבעין ונוטלין מבעה"ב נימא מיגו דחשיד אממונא חשיד אשבועתא
— why do we not say that since he is suspected of fraud in money matters he must also be suspected of swearing falsely? Moreover, there is the case where R. Hiyya taught: Both of them swear, and receive payment from the employer,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of the shopkeeper and his creditbook. V. supra 2a, Shebu. 47b. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore reference for Bava Metzia 11:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.