Reference for Bava Metzia 192:10
בעי רמי בר חמא בעל בנכסי אשתו מי מעל
Rami b. Hama propounded: When the husband [obtains the privilege of usufruct] in his wife's property [which belonged to <i>hekdesh</i>], who is liable to a trespass offering?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., if she inherited property after marriage, which included, unknown to her husband, money belonging to hekdesh (v. Glos.). By a Rabbinical enactment, the husband becomes a beneficiary in respect of the usufruct of anything inherited by his wife after marriage. Now, it was assumed that the very fact that the husband is empowered to spend this money for its usufruct is as though it were already removed from the possession of hekdesh, even if it has not been actually expended. Since such removal, if done unintentionally, imposes a liability to a trespass offering, Rami b. Hama asked upon whom it falls. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>