Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Bava Metzia 41:19

איתמר

R. JUDAH SAYS: WHATSOEVER HAS IN IT SOMETHING UNUSUAL MUST BE ANNOUNCED,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. infra 23a. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> AS, FOR INSTANCE, IF ONE FINDS A ROUND [OF FIGS] CONTAINING A POTSHERD, OR A LOAF CONTAINING MONEY. R. SIMEON B. ELEAZAR SAYS: NEW MERCHANDISE<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 23b. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> NEED NOT BE ANNOUNCED. <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. IF ONE FINDS SCATTERED FRUIT, etc. What quantity [of fruit in a given space] is meant? R. Isaac said: A <i>kab</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A measure. V. Glos. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> within four cubits. But what kind of a case is meant? If [the fruit appears to have been] dropped accidentally, then even if there is more than a <i>kab</i> [it should] also [belong to the finder].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the loser would have no means of identifying them. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> And if it appears to have been [deliberately] put down, then even if there is a smaller quantity it should not [belong to the finder]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the owner evidently intended to come back for them and has not really lost them. ');"><sup>21</sup></span> — R. 'Ukba b. Hama answered: We deal here with [the remains of] what has been gathered on the threshing floor:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the harvest. ');"><sup>22</sup></span> [To collect] a <i>kab</i> [scattered over a space] of four cubits is troublesome, and, as people do not trouble to come back and collect it, [the owner also] abandons it, but if it is [spread over] a smaller space [the owner] does come back and collect it, and he does not abandon it. R. Jeremiah enquired: How is it [if one finds] half a <i>kab</i> [scattered over the space] of two cubits? Is the reason why a <i>kab</i> within four cubits [belongs to the finder] that it is troublesome [to collect], and therefore half a <i>kab</i> within two cubits, which is not troublesome to collect, is not abandoned [and should not belong to the finder], or is the reason [in the case of a <i>kab</i> within four cubits] that it is not worth the trouble of collecting [when spread over such a space], and therefore half a <i>kab</i> within two cubits, which is still less worth the trouble of collecting, is abandoned [and should belong to the finder]? [Again,] how is it [if one finds] two <i>kabs</i> [scattered over the space] of eight cubits? Is the reason why a <i>kab</i> within four cubits [belongs to the finder] that it is troublesome to collect, and therefore two <i>kabs</i> within eight cubits, which are still more troublesome to collect, are even more readily abandoned [and should certainly belong to the finder], or is the reason [in the case of a <i>kab</i> within four cubits] that it is not worth the trouble [of collecting], and therefore two <i>kabs</i> within eight cubits, which are worth the trouble [of collecting] are not abandoned [and should not belong to the finder]? [Again,] how is it [if one finds] a <i>kab</i> of poppy-seed [scattered over a space] of four cubits? Is the reason why a <i>kab</i> [of fruit] within four cubits [belongs to the finder] that it is not worth the trouble [of collecting], and therefore poppy-seed, which is worth the trouble [of collecting] is not abandoned [and should not belong to the finder], or is the reason [in the case of a <i>kab</i> within four cubits] that it is troublesome [to collect], and therefore poppy-seed, which is even more troublesome [to collect], is abandoned [and should belong to the finder]? [Again], how is it [if one finds] a <i>kab</i> of dates within four cubits, or a <i>kab</i> of pomegranates within four cubits? Is the reason why a <i>kab</i> [of ordinary fruit] within four cubits [belongs to the finder] that it is not worth the trouble of collecting, and therefore a <i>kab</i> of dates within four cubits, or a <i>kab</i> of pomegranates within four cubits, which also is not worth the trouble [of collecting] is abandoned [and should belong to the finder], or is the reason [in the case of a <i>kab</i> within four cubits] that it is troublesome to collect, and therefore a <i>kab</i> of dates within four cubits or a <i>kab</i> of pomegranates within four cubits, which are not troublesome [to collect], are not abandoned [and should not belong to the finder]? — The questions remain unanswered. It has been stated:

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse