Reference for Chullin 65:2

עד כאן לא איבעיא לן אלא לטהרה מידי נבלה אבל באכילה אסורה

Now the question put [by R'Zera] was only as to whether or not the animal was to be regarded as clean, and not nebelah, but [admittedly] it is forbidden to be eaten.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But this cannot be reconciled with the objection he raised against Raba. It is therefore right to say that R. Zera withdrew his objection.');">¹</span>

Explore reference for Chullin 65:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.