Reference for Eruvin 136:9

ושמואל אמר אנא דאמרי אפילו כרבנן עד כאן לא קאמרי רבנן התם אלא מאי דבטיל בטיל ודלא בטיל לא בטיל אבל מאי דבטיל מיהא איסתלק לגמרי

Samuel also can answer you: l may uphold my ruling even according to the view of the Rabbis; for it was only there that the Rabbis maintained their ruling,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the renunciation of a tenant's Share in a courtyard does not imply his renunciation to his rights in his house.');">²⁶</span> since only that which a man actually renounced can be deemed to have been renounced while that which he did not actually renounce cannot be so regarded, but from that at least which a man does renounce he is eliminated completely.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the tenant in question renounced his right to the courtyard he must be regarded as a tenant of a different courtyard in whose favour no right in the former courtyard may subsequently be renounced.');">²⁷</span> R'Aha B'Hana<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' MS.M., 'Rabbah b. Bar Hana'.');">²⁸</span> citing R'Shesheth stated: Their views<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Those of Rab and Samuel on the question of a renunciation that followed a renunciation.');">²⁹</span>

Explore reference for Eruvin 136:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.