Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Kiddushin 145:18

אמר רבא בר רב הונא מצאו מהול

But [you must answer that] it is rare: then here too,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With respect to a shethuki marrying an ordinary person.');"><sup>20</sup></span> it is rare!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though the former is certainly unfit, while the latter is doubtful.');"><sup>1</sup></span> - But [the reason is:] a higher standard was set up in respect to genealogy. Raba also said: By Biblical law, a foundling is fit. What is the reason? A married woman ascribes [an illegitimate child] to her husband.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And would not cast him away.');"><sup>22</sup></span> What [fear] is there?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the foundling may be mamzer?');"><sup>23</sup></span> [Because of] a minority of arusoth<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Pl. of arusah.');"><sup>24</sup></span> and a minority whose husbands have gone overseas?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the foundling may be theirs.');"><sup>25</sup></span> But since there are unmarried [women], and also [children thrown away] on account of poverty,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'hunger,' - the child may be legitimately born. - The child of an unmarried woman is not mamzer.');"><sup>26</sup></span> it is half and half, and the Torah said: 'A mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of the Lord': only a certain mamzer may not enter, but a doubtful mamzer may; only into a certain assembly may he not enter, but he may enter into a doubtful one. Why then did they [the Rabbis] rule that a foundling is unfit? Lest he marry his paternal sister.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But there is no fear of his maternal sister, for since we know his intended mother-in-law as a virtuous woman, we do not suspect her of adultery and that this may be her son (Rashi) . Of course, the same might be urged of his intended father-in-law, but that it is easier for a man to conceal an illegitimate liaison than for a woman (Maharsha) .');"><sup>27</sup></span> If so, one foundling should not marry another, lest he marry his sister by his father or and his mother? - Do all these go throwing [their children away]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Are we to assume all foundlings the children of the same mother or father!');"><sup>28</sup></span> Let him not marry the daughter of a foundling, lest he marry his sister? But [you must answer that] it is rare: then here too<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With respect to a foundling marrying an ordinary person.');"><sup>29</sup></span> it is rare!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 374, n. 4.');"><sup>30</sup></span> - But [the reason is:] a higher standard was set up in respect to genealogy. Rabbah son of R'Huna said: If he [the foundling] is found circumcised,

Explore reference for Kiddushin 145:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse