Reference for Kiddushin 73:10

ואתא ר"א למימר אף חדש נוהג בין בארץ בין בח"ל מ"ט מושב בכל מקום שאתם יושבים

The scholars propounded: Does R'Eleazar disagree in the direction of leniency or [greater] stringency? 'In the direction of stringency,' the first Tanna stating thus: EXCEPTING 'ORLAH AND KIL' AYIM, concerning which there is a traditional law, though one might argue that it is a duty connected with the soil, but hadash is practised only in the Land, but not without. What is the reason? 'Dwelling' implies after taking possession and settling down.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The section on hadash is concluded with the passage: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations in all your dwellings (Lev. XXIII, 14) . Now, it might be held that 'in all your dwellings' implies that hadash is binding even without Palestine. This Tanna, however, on the present hypothesis, maintains that on the contrary it teaches that even in Palestine it came into force only after the Israelites had conquered the land and settled down in dwellings, but not while they were fighting and dividing up the country.');">¹³</span>

Explore reference for Kiddushin 73:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.