Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Shabbat 136:5

קתני מיהא כיצד תינוק בשלמא לרב ושמואל ניחא אלא לרבי יוחנן ולרבי שמעון בן לקיש קשיא אמרי לך רבי יוחנן וריש לקיש לא מי איכא מונבז דפטר אנן דאמרינן כמונבז

Even so, he replied, and all the more so since you have added [this argument]. As you define it,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'according to your words'. ');"><sup>8</sup></span> such is not designated unwitting, but wilful transgression, he retorted. Now after all it is stated, 'E.g., if a child' [etc.]: as for Rab and Samuel, it is well.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For they too maintain that he is liable. Now, they can argue that the same holds good even if one originally knew the law but subsequently forgot it, just as they explain the Mishnah, while the particular illustration is given because of Monabaz's dissent in this case. ');"><sup>9</sup></span>

Explore reference for Shabbat 136:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse