Reference for Temurah 17:42
דת"ר
If it had written so, I might have said that where [the intention is for the origina animal] to lose its holiness and the [substituted one] to acquire holiness,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Although the exchange does not succeed in removing holiness from the unblemished consecrated animal, he is nevertheless punished with lashes, for his intention was to release it from its sanctity.');"><sup>30</sup></span>
Explore reference for Temurah 17:42. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.