Reference for Yevamot 104:9

תניא אידך החולץ ליבמתו וחזר וקדשה רבי אומר אם קדשה לשום אישות צריכה הימנו גט לשום יבמות אין צריכה הימנו גט וחכמים אומרים בין שקדשה לשום אישות בין שקדשה לשום יבמות צריכה הימנו גט

Likewise it was also taught: Rabbi said, this statement<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That no act is valid after halizah. ');">²⁵</span> was made only in accordance with the view of R. Akiba who treated a <i>haluzah</i> as a forbidden relative;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As no act of betrothal is valid in the case of the latter so is no such act valid in that of the former. ');">²⁶</span> the Sages, however, maintain that there is some validity in acts after <i>halizah</i>; and I say, 'When [is betrothal after <i>halizah</i> valid]? Only when he betrothed her as in ordinary matrimony,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By a form of betrothal prescribed in ordinary cases other than those of a levir. Such betrothal is valid even where it involves the transgression of a negative precept. ');">²⁷</span>

Explore reference for Yevamot 104:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.