Reference for Yevamot 62:6
אלא למ"ד משום בת אחותו ליתקין זמן
since a betrothed woman has no [need to reclaim] usufruct — 14 According to him, however, who holds [that it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The insertion of a date 10 a letter of divorce. ');"><sup>15</sup></span> was ordained] on account of one's sister's daughter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who was his wife and had committed adultery. Her uncle, in his desire to protect her, might supply her with an undated letter of divorce which would enable her to escape her due punishment by pleading that the offence had been committed after she had been divorced. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> the insertion of a date should have been ordained [in the case of betrothal also]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since a betrothed woman also possessing an undated document of betrothal could protect herself against punishment for adultery. by pleading that the offence had been committed prior to the betrothal. ');"><sup>17</sup></span>
Explore reference for Yevamot 62:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.