Related%20passage for Eruvin 132:14
נתנו עירובן בחיצונה ושכח אחד בין מן הפנימית ובין מן החיצונה ולא עירב שתיהן אסורות האי בר פנימית למאן ניבטיל ליבטיל לבני פנימית ליתא לערובייהו גבייהו ליבטיל לבני חיצונה אין בטול רשות מחצר לחצר
in favour of the tenants of the outer courtyard also?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And by eliminating himself in this manner from both courtyards enable both groups of tenants to have the unrestricted use of the courtyards.');"><sup>41</sup></span> Surely no domain may be renounced where two courtyards are involved!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'from courtyard to courtyard', sc. according to Samuel no tenant of one courtyard may renounce his right to his share in favour of a tenant of another courtyard even though, in the absence of such renunciation, he imposes restrictions upon him.');"><sup>42</sup></span> As to the tenant of the outer courtyard<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who failed to participate in the 'erub.');"><sup>43</sup></span> too in whose favour could he renounce his right?
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 132:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.