Related%20passage for Eruvin 132:16
נתנו עירובן בפנימית ושכח אחד מן הפנימית ולא עירב שתיהן אסורות האי בר פנימית למאן נבטיל ליבטיל לבני הפנימית איכא חיצונה דאסרה עלייהו ליבטיל לבני חיצונה אין ביטול רשות מחצר לחצר
would impose the restrictions upon them! Should he renounce it in favour of the tenants of the inner courtyard also?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 7.');"><sup>46</sup></span> Surely no domain may be renounced where two courtyards are involved!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'from courtyard to courtyard', sc. according to Samuel no tenant of one courtyard may renounce his right to his share in favour of a tenant of another courtyard even though, in the absence of such renunciation, he imposes restrictions upon him.');"><sup>42</sup></span> 'If they deposited their 'erub in the inner courtyard and one tenant of the inner courtyard forgot to participate in the 'erub, the use of both courtyards is restricted'. For in whose favour could this tenant of the inner courtyard<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who failed to participate in the 'erub.');"><sup>47</sup></span> renounce his right? Should he renounce it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The right to his share in his courtyard.');"><sup>48</sup></span> in favour of the tenants of the inner courtyard? There would still remain the tenants of the outer courtyard who<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On account of their participation in the 'erub that was deposited in the inner courtyard, which has conferred upon them the status of tenants.');"><sup>49</sup></span> would impose restrictions upon them! Should he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The inner tenant who did not participate in the 'erub.');"><sup>50</sup></span> renounce his right<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of way in the outer courtyard.');"><sup>51</sup></span> in favour of the tenants of the outer courtyard also?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 464, n. 7.');"><sup>52</sup></span> Surely no domain may be renounced where two courtyards are involved!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 464, n. 8.');"><sup>53</sup></span>
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 132:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.