Related%20passage for Eruvin 137:10

אמר רב הונא איזהו ישראל מומר זה המחלל שבתות בפרהסיא א"ל רב נחמן כמאן אי כר"מ דאמר חשוד לדבר א' חשוד לכל התורה כולה אפי' בא' מכל איסורין שבתורה נמי

- Rather read: 'A barefaced mumar<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. one who desecrates the Sabbath in public.');">²⁹</span> is not entitled to renounce his share'. Now in agreement with whose [view has this been laid down]? - In agreement, of course, with that of R'Judah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As has just been explained. It cannot be in agreement with the views of R. Meir since he allows even a mumar who desecrates the Sabbath in public to renounce his share. -');">³⁰</span> A certain man once went out<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the Sabbath when the carrying of objects in a public domain is forbidden.');">³¹</span> with a jewelled charm<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Humarta di-medusha, a 'charm', 'ball' or 'bead' containing a 'jewel for sealing'; or 'a small bundle of spices' (cf. Rashi a.l. anti Jast.) . Such an object, not being regarded as a personal ornament, may not be carried on the Sabbath in a public domain even on one's person.');">³²</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 137:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.