Related%20passage for Eruvin 205:13

ואידך דומיא דהרכיבו והבאתו מחוץ לתחום קתני דרבנן

and as regards 'bringing it from without the permitted Sabbath limit', he is in agreement with R'Akiba who holds that the laws relating to Sabbath limits are Pentateuchal.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sot. 27b. As the two rulings of 'carrying' and 'bringing' embody Pentateuchal prohibitions the third one, that relating to the wen, must also be Pentateuchal.');">⁴⁰</span> R'Joseph raised an objection: R'Eliezer argued,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Against the anonymous ruling in the Mishnah of Pesahim under discussion.');">⁴¹</span> May not this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' His statement that the acts enumerated in the anonymous ruling do supersede the Sabbath.');">⁴²</span> be inferred a minori ad majus?

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 205:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.