Related%20passage for Eruvin 56:19

ולא היא צנון נטעי אינשי אדעתא דפוגלא דיקלא לא נטעי אינשי אדעתא דקורא ואע"ג דקלסיה שמואל לרב יהודה הלכתא כוותיה דשמואל:

Was it not in fact taught: A skin and a placenta are not susceptible to the defilement of food, but a skin that was boiled and a placenta that one intended [to boil] are susceptible to food defilement?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hul. 77b. Now, if boiling is effective in the case of a skin which is much less of a food than the heart of a palm, how could it be maintained that the process is ineffective in the latter case?');">³⁴</span> - Rather, said Raba, the practical difference between them' is [the form of] the benediction.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first Tanna ordains that for the fruit of the ground while R. Judah requires, 'by Whose word etc.' V. infra.');">³⁵</span> For it was stated,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By Amoras. tbbha iba ia');">³⁶</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 56:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.