Related%20passage for Eruvin 60:19
והא דתניא רבי יהודה אומר
On what principle do they differ? One Master is of the opinion that a movable<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'thrown.');"><sup>46</sup></span> tent has not the status of a valid tent<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it cannot constitute a screen between the man and the unclean territory.');"><sup>51</sup></span> and the other Master maintains that even a movable<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'thrown.');"><sup>46</sup></span> tent<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Provided its dimensions are of the prescribed size.');"><sup>52</sup></span> has the status of a valid tent.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And constitutes a valid screen. The first Tanna is thus in agreement with Rabbi's view while R. Judah is of the same opinion as R. Jose son of R. Judah.');"><sup>53</sup></span> It was taught:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So MS.M. and Rashal. Cur. edd., 'but that which was taught'.');"><sup>54</sup></span> R'Judah ruled,
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 60:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.