Related%20passage for Gittin 106:10
דר"מ אדרבי מאיר לא קשיא כי קניס בדרבנן בדאורייתא לא קניס
May we say that Tannaim also [differ on this point]? [For it was taught:] If one defiles [another's foodstuffs] or mixes <i>terumah</i> with them or pours a libation from his wine, whether inadvertently or deliberately, he is liable [to make compensation]. So R. Meir. R. Judah says: If inadvertently he is not liable, if deliberately he is liable. Is not the point at issue between them this, that the one authority holds that damage of which there is no visible sign is legally accounted damage, while the other holds that it is not legally accounted damage? — R. Nahman b. Isaac said: Both agree that damage of which there is no visible sign is not legally accounted damage, and here the point at issue between them is whether the inadvertent [act] should be penalised on account of the presumptuous one,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even though according to strict justice he should not be so penalised. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore related%20passage for Gittin 106:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.