Related%20passage for Nedarim 65:10

מאן תנא אמר רב הושעיא זו

<b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. Hence the first clause applies even where such things are not hired. Which Tanna [rules thus]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That even where the benefit is so trifling, since it can be borrowed without a fee, it is forbidden. ');">¹⁰</span> — Said R. Adda b. Ahabah: It is R. Eliezer.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 100, n. 5. ');">¹¹</span> <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. IF ONE IS UNDER A VOW NOT TO BENEFIT FROM HIS NEIGHBOUR, THE LATTER MAY PAY HIS <i>SHEKEL</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' There was an annual tax of half a shekel for the upkeep of the Temple; v. Shek. I, 1; Ex. XXX, 13. ');">¹²</span> SETTLE HIS DEBTS, AND RETURN A LOST ARTICLE TO HIM. WHERE PAYMENT IS TAKEN FOR THIS,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., if he lost work through returning the article; v. B.M. 30b. ');">¹³</span> THE BENEFIT MUST ACCRUE TO HEKDESH.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. This is discussed in the Gemara. ');">¹⁴</span> <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. Thus we see that it is merely driving away a lion [from his neighbour's property],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., he is merely performing a neighbourly action, without bestowing real benefit, for even if the other man does not pay the shekel, he still shares in the public sacrifices; also, when his debts are settled, the debtor personally receives nothing. ');">¹⁵</span> and permitted. Which Tanna [rules thus]? — Said R. Hoshaia: This is

Explore related%20passage for Nedarim 65:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.