Related%20passage for Pesachim 54:12

אמרו לו שור הנסקל יוכיח שאסור באכילה ובהנאה ואינו טעון שריפה אמר להן הפרש נותר אסור באכילה ובהנאה וענוש כרת וחמץ אסור באכילה ובהנאה וענוש כרת מה נותר בשריפה אף חמץ בשריפה אמרו לו חלבו של שור הנסקל יוכיח שאסור באכילה ובהנאה וענוש כרת ואין טעון שריפה

R'Judah argued again [with] another argument.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not on the basis of an a minori argument, but a gezerah shawah, the conclusion of which is accepted irrespective of the result.');">¹⁷</span> Nothar is forbidden for eating and leaven is forbidden for eating: just as nothar [is disposed of] by burning, so is leaven [destroyed] by burning. Said they to him, Let nebelah prove [it]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., refute the argument.');">¹⁸</span> for it is forbidden for eating yet does not require burning. Said he to them, There is a difference:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Between nebelah on the one hand and nothar and leaven on the other.');">¹⁹</span> nothar is forbidden for eating and for [all] use, and leaven is forbidden for eating and for [all] use: just as nothar requires burning, so does leaven require burning. Let the ox that is stoned<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Ex. XXI, 28.');">²⁰</span> prove it, they replied: i is forbidden for eating and for [all] use, yet it does not require burning. Said he to them, There is a difference: Nothar is forbidden for eating and for [all] use, and he [who eats it] is punished with kareth, and leaven is forbidden for eating and for [all] use, and he is punished with kareth: just as nothar [must be destroyed] by burning, so is leaven [destroyed] by burning. Said they to him, Let the heleb of the ox that is stoned prove it, which is forbidden for eating, for [all] use, and involves the penalty of kareth, yet it does n require burning.

Explore related%20passage for Pesachim 54:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.