Related for Bava Batra 101:3
הא ראיה יש לימא לגלויי זוזי הוא דבעי
A WIFE HAS NO <i>HAZAKAH</i> IN THE PROPERTY OF HER HUSBAND. Surely this is self-evident; since the husband has to maintain her, [we suppose that when she occupies the field] she is merely deriving her maintenance from it? — The rule had to be stated [to cover the case] where he assigned her another field for her maintenance.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case, but for the rule of the Mishnah, I might suppose that three years' occupation would give her hazakah. ');"><sup>5</sup></span> [Since the Mishnah says only that the wife has no <i>hazakah</i>], we infer that if she brings proof<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., a deed of sale or witnesses. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Mishnah Peah
Rabbi Eliezer says: a piece of ground [large enough to plant] one fourth of a kav is liable for peah. Rabbi Joshua says: it must [be large enough] to grow two seahs. Rabbi Tarfon says: it must be six by six handbreadths. R. Judah ben Batera says: [it must be large enough] for a sickle to cut at least two handfuls and the halakhah is according to his words. Rabbi Akiva says: any size of land is liable for peah and for first-fruits, and [is sufficient] for the writing of the prozbul, and also to acquire through it movable property by money, by deed, or by a claim based on undisturbed possession.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy