Related for Bava Batra 193:13

למעוטי מאי אילימא למעוטי יין מגתו והא תאני ר' חייא יין מגתו לא יביא ואם הביא כשר וכיון דאם הביא כשר אנן אפילו לכתחלה נמי

[does he not, thereby,] reveal his intention [of using them]? — R. papa replied: In [the case<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And for this R. Simeon's statement is required. ');">²³</span> of] a cow which drank the [infusions] one after the others [and, consequently, the owner's intention is not known].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In such a case there is a difference whether the infusion is regarded as wine effecting fitness for uncleanness or as water and effecting no fitness. If the cow drank the first infusion only, the law will be applicable to the second infusion. If it drank the second, the law is required for the third. ');">²⁴</span> R. Zutra b. Tobiah said in the name of Rab: The <i>Kiddush</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' ause 'sanctification', applied here to the proclamation of the sanctity of the Sabbath or Festival, which is made on Sabbaths and Festivals over a cup of wine, to which other appropriate benedictions are added. ');">²⁵</span> of the day must be proclaimed on such wine only as is fit to be brought as a drink offering upon the altar. What does this exclude? If it is suggested that it excludes wine [that comes] from his vat,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., too new. ');">²⁶</span> [it may be retorted]: Did not R. Hiyya teach, 'One must not bring wine from his vat [as a drink offering], but if already brought, it is permitted [to be used]'; and, since [in the case of offerings] it is permitted when brought, it [should be allowed for <i>Kiddush</i>] even at the start also.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Kiddush is not as high in importance as Temple offerings. ');">²⁷</span>

Explore related for Bava Batra 193:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.