Related for Bava Batra 252:10

ההוא דאתא לקמיה דרבה בר בר חנה א"ל מוחזקני בזה שהוא בכור א"ל מנא ידעת דהוה קרי ליה אבוה בוכרא סכלא דלמא בוכרא דאמא הוא דכל בוכרא דאמא נמי בוכרא סכלא קארו ליה

on condition that thou shalt have no [claim] upon me [for] food, raiment and conjugal rights' she is consecrated<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Becomes his legal wife. ');">²⁷</span> but the stipulation is null;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because it is contrary to the law of the Torah. Cf. Ex. XXI, 10. ');">²⁸</span> these are the words of R. Meir. R. Judah said: In respect of the money matters his stipulation is valid!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., her 'food and raiment'. Now since the law is always decided in accordance with the view of R. Judah, in opposition to the rival view' of R. Meir, is it likely that our Mishnah is contrary to the accepted law? ');">²⁹</span>

Explore related for Bava Batra 252:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.