בעי רבי ירמיה מכרה חוץ משלשים יום חוץ ממלאכתה חוץ מעוברה מהו
he would not have to make four-fold and five-fold payments, whereas the wool of the animal being a part which is usually shorn off could not be reckoned as an reservation, and he would thus have to make four-fold or five-fold payment. But the other Tanna of the School of R. Simeon b. Eleazar maintained that its fore-paws or feet which require slaughter [to render them permissible] form a reservation, and he would not have to pay four-fold and five-fold payments, whereas its horns or its wool, as they do not require slaughter [to render them permissible] would not constitute a reservation. But does R. Simeon b. Eleazar not contradict himself? — Two Tannaim report differently the view of R. Simeon b. Eleazar.
Tosefta Bava Kamma
4. One who stole and afterwards cooked, one who stole and afterwards sold, one who stole and afterwards exchanged, one who stole and afterwards made sacred, one who stole and afterwards gave as a gift, one who stole and afterwards gave as credit, one who stole and afterwards paid one's debt, one who stole and afterwards gave as engagement gifts to the house of one's in-laws - [all those cases] pay four and five times.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosefta Bava Kamma
4. One who stole and afterwards cooked, one who stole and afterwards sold, one who stole and afterwards exchanged, one who stole and afterwards made sacred, one who stole and afterwards gave as a gift, one who stole and afterwards gave as credit, one who stole and afterwards paid one's debt, one who stole and afterwards gave as engagement gifts to the house of one's in-laws - [all those cases] pay four and five times.
