Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related for Bava Metzia 105:1

ואסורים לזרים והן נכסי כהן ועולים באחד ומאה וטעונין רחיצת ידים והערב שמש הרי אלו בתרומה ובכורים מה שאין כן במעשר

they are forbidden to zarim,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Zar (q.v.) pl. zarim. — This would appear obvious after the previous statement. Rashi observes that it is in fact unnecessary per se, but that its purpose is to mark the contrast with tithes, which, as the Mishnah proceeds to teach, is permitted to zarim. Tosaf., following J. Bik. II, explains: even half the minimum quantity, which involves no penalty of death or the addition of a fifth, is forbidden to zarim. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> accounted as the priest's [personal] property,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In that he can employ them as kiddushin (q.v. Glos.) for betrothing a woman; v. infra n. 8. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> are neutralised by one hundred and one [times their quantity].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If a quantity of terumah or first fruits fell into hundred times as much hullin (common food) and cannot be distinguished therefrom, it is neutralised or annulled, and the whole is permitted to a zar. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>

Tosefta Bikkurim

And so too Rabbi Shimon would say, [the Sages] did not state that produce that grows from [the seeds of] first fruits must be eaten in Jerusalem. "Tithes" -- about which "tithes" did they speak [when the Sages ruled that aftergrowths must be treated as tithes (see Ter. 9:6)]? [They ruled that aftergrowths are treated as tithes only] with regards to anything whose seed disintegrates [after planting], with regards to [produce] that is taken in and out of Jerusalem, with regards to [produce] that does not have the value of a perutah, and with regards to [produce] that is not [subject to the laws of] redemption. Rabbi Shimon ben Yehuda says in the name of Rabbi Shimon, one is not liable [to bring] first fruits that are attached to the ground.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full ChapterNext Verse