Related for Chullin 225:14

תנא סיפא טהור מליח וטמא תפל מכלל דרישא שניהן מלוחין ואפ"ה שרי

And indeed this supposition is reasonable, since if we assume the first clause to refer to the case where both were salted, seeing that where both were salted it is permitted, is it necessary [to tell us that it permitted] where only the clean fish was salted and not the unclean? - This however is not a conclusive argument.

Explore related for Chullin 225:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.