Related for Sotah 49:10
איבעיא להו עוברת על דת ורצה בעל לקיימה מקיימה או אינו מקיימה מי אמרינן בקפידא דבעל תלא רחמנא והא לא קפיד או דלמא כיון דקפיד קפיד
R. Hanina of Sura said; Come and hear: IN THE FOLLOWING CASES A COURT OF LAW CAN GIVE WARNING: WHEN THE HUSBAND IS A DEAF-MUTE OR HAS BECOME INSANE OR IS IMPRISONED. NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING HER DRINK DID THEY SAY THIS BUT TO DISQUALIFY HER IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARRIAGE-SETTLEMENT. Conclude from this that she does require to be warned! That conclusion is to be drawn. But why did not [the other Rabbis] draw the inference from this passage? — [They thought] perhaps it is different in the circumstance where she had no cause at all to be afraid of her husband.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he was incapacitated; but in normal circumstances, they imagined that she would lose her marriage-settlement without a warning. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore related for Sotah 49:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.