Related for Yevamot 225:18

בעא רב אשי מ"ט דר' אלעזר מיפשט פשיטא לי' דחרש דעתא קלישתא הוא ומיהו מספקא לי' אי דעתא צילותא

But does R. Eleazar require [a condition similar to that of eating] one of two pieces? Surely, it was taught: R. Eleazar stated: For [eating] the suet of a koy<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A kind of antelope, [G], concerning which it was unknown whether it belonged to the genus of cattle whose suet is forbidden or to that of the beast of chase whose suet is permitted. Cf. Hul. 80a. ');">⁴⁸</span> one incurs the obligation of an <i>asham talui</i>!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though the doubt relates to one object only. ');">⁴⁹</span> — Samuel is of the same opinion as R. Eleazar in one case<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In regard to terumah. ');">⁵⁰</span> but differs from him in the other.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In regard to the liability of an asham talui. ');">⁵¹</span> Others read: R. Hiyya b. Ashi stated in the name of Samuel: For [unwitting intercourse with] the wife of a deaf man the obligation of an <i>asham talui</i> is incurred.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 795. n. 14 mutatis mutandis. ');">⁵²</span> An objection was raised: There are five who may not set apart <i>terumah</i>!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 796. n. 2 mutatis mutandis. ');">⁵³</span> — He<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Samuel. ');">⁵⁴</span> holds the same view as R. Eleazar.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 796. n. 7 (mutatis mutandis) and text. ');">⁵⁵</span> R. Ashi asked: What is R. Eleazar's reason? Is he positive that the mind of a deaf man is feeble but in doubt whether that mind is clear<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And whatever little his feebleness enables him to do he can do well at all times. ');">⁵⁶</span>

Explore related for Yevamot 225:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.