Responsa for Bava Batra 348:2
איכא בינייהו כשחייב מודה אי נמי דשמתוהו ומת בשמתיה
where he was placed under the ban<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' for refusing to obey an order of the court for the payment of the debt. ');"><sup>4</sup></span> and died [while still] under the ban.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In both these cases it is obvious that the debtor had not entrusted the creditor with any valuables as a security for the loan. Hence, according to R. Huna, the orphans, whose duty it is to discharge their father's debts, must indemnify the guarantor. According to R. Papa. however, they are not obliged to pay even in such cases. ');"><sup>5</sup></span> [A message] was sent from Palestine:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'from there'. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. Since B's mother did not take the required oath regarding her ketubah, she had no property of her own; even the clothes she wore on week-days belonged to the estate. Consequently B is unable to carry out his mother's instructions. B is under no moral obligation to repay his mother's debt since the mother herself had not been pressed for payment.
SOURCES: Cr. 76.