Responsa for Bava Batra 88:1
בסתמא דלא משתעבדא ליה מאי טעמא מטלטלי נינהו ומטלטלי לבע"ח לא משתעבדי ואע"ג דכתב ליה מגלימא דעל כתפיה הני מילי דאיתנהו בעינייהו אבל ליתנהו בעינייהו לא
that [if he sells them without] having declared them security [to a creditor], the creditor has no lien on them<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And therefore the seller who is also the debtor has no special interest in confirming them in the possession of the purchaser and so can testify on his behalf. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
Q. A gave a writ of bestowal of movable property to B, in which the clause "the movable property is thus transferred to B together with, and by dint of, real property", was missing. Is the gift binding?
A. I have examined the writ of bestowal and could find nothing wrong with it, for title to movable property can also be transferred by halifin (symbol of exchange).
SOURCES: Cr. 256; Pr. 344.
A. I have examined the writ of bestowal and could find nothing wrong with it, for title to movable property can also be transferred by halifin (symbol of exchange).
SOURCES: Cr. 256; Pr. 344.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Teshuvot Maharam
Q. A gave a writ of bestowal of movable property to B, in which the clause "the movable property is thus transferred to B together with, and by dint of, real property", was missing. Is the gift binding?
A. I have examined the writ of bestowal and could find nothing wrong with it, for title to movable property can also be transferred by halifin (symbol of exchange).
SOURCES: Cr. 256; Pr. 344.
A. I have examined the writ of bestowal and could find nothing wrong with it, for title to movable property can also be transferred by halifin (symbol of exchange).
SOURCES: Cr. 256; Pr. 344.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy