Responsa for Yevamot 184:4

איתגורי איתגר א"כ מצינו חוטא נשכר אלא אם היה יבמה ישראל נותן לה שני גט והותרה לו

or rather indicated<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that it came'. ');">¹¹</span> that betrothal with such a woman is invalid. R. Mari b. Rachel said to R. Ashi: Thus said Amemar, 'The law is in agreement with Samuel'. Said R. Ashi: Now that Amemar has said that the law is in agreement with Samuel, her levir,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The brother-in-law of the widow, spoken of in the first case of our Mishnah, who married a stranger and from whom, according to Samuel, she requires a divorce. ');">¹³</span> if he was a priest,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To whom the sister-in-jaw would thus be forbidden even after she had been divorced by the stranger. A priest is forbidden to marry a divorced woman. V. Lev. XXI, 7. ');">¹⁴</span>

Explore responsa for Yevamot 184:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.